IPO Guru
IPO Guru Ahimsa Framework

IPO Ahimsa Classification Methodology

How we label a company Ahimsa, Partial Ahimsa or Non-Ahimsa — and what those labels do and do not mean.

Ahimsa Partial Ahimsa Non-Ahimsa

Many investors want to know whether a company's business involves harm to animals before they put money into it. For companies already listed there are now published screens for exactly this — the Ahimsa Investment Movement's AQ (Ahimsa Quotient) framework, and the Nifty500 Ahimsa Index launched by NSE Indices with the Ahimsagain Foundation in July 2026.

Neither reaches a company that has not listed yet. That is the gap we fill: the IPO Guru Ahimsa Framework applies the same three-band idea to IPOs and unlisted shares, so the question can be asked before the shares exist rather than years afterwards.

Section 01

The Three Bands

Every company we cover falls into one of three bands, decided by what its business actually does — the products it makes and the money it earns, not every possible indirect link.

Ahimsa High AQ Index-eligible

Very little or no animal involvement in the core business.

Software & IT · Telecom · Cement · Machinery · Hospitals · Mining · Oil & gas · Synthetic leather · Housing finance · Insurers · Stock exchanges

Partial Ahimsa Medium AQ

A genuine but smaller animal-linked line, or money spread across the economy.

Banks & NBFCs · Broking · Asset management · Hotels serving non-veg · FMCG with a honey or ghee line · Apparel with a small leather range

Non-Ahimsa Low AQ

Direct, significant or core involvement in animal harm.

Meat, poultry, fish, eggs & dairy · Leather, wool & silk · Animal feed · Drugs, cosmetics & biotech · Insecticides · Alcohol · Tobacco · Weapons · Gambling

No fixed revenue cut-offs. The AQ framework publishes none — its bands turn on qualitative judgements about what is a "real and significant part" of a business versus a "tiny amount". Ours necessarily do the same, and reasonable people can disagree about individual companies.

Section 02

Where Each Industry Lands

A few placements surprise people, so they are worth stating outright.

Hospitals & diagnostics Ahimsa

Healthcare delivery, not drug manufacture

Synthetic & PU leather Ahimsa

A substitute for the animal product, not the product

Housing finance & insurers Ahimsa

Finance tied to one animal-neutral purpose

Stock exchanges & depositories Ahimsa

Market infrastructure, no lending exposure

Sugar mills, paints, tyres Ahimsa

Ordinary manufacturing with no animal input

Banks, NBFCs, asset managers Partial Ahimsa

Money spread broadly across the whole economy

Hotels & parks serving non-veg Partial Ahimsa

A real but smaller animal-linked line

FMCG with a honey or ghee line Partial Ahimsa

One genuine animal-based product among many

Drug & cosmetic manufacturers Non-Ahimsa

Depend on legally required live-animal testing

Contract research & biotech Non-Ahimsa

Conduct animal testing or use animal-derived materials

Insecticides & rodenticides Non-Ahimsa

Products designed to kill animals

Dairy, meat, poultry, fisheries Non-Ahimsa

Core business is an animal product

Section 03

On Pharmaceuticals

This is the classification people query most, so it is worth stating plainly.

A company whose core business is making drugs or cosmetics relies on large-scale, legally required live-animal testing, and is therefore placed in the lowest band. Contract Research Organisations and biotech firms that conduct animal testing, or depend on animal-derived laboratory materials, are treated the same way.

What this label does not say

It follows that many perfectly reputable, well-run pharmaceutical companies carry a Non-Ahimsa label here. That is a statement about an industry-wide regulatory requirement — not an allegation of wrongdoing by any particular company, and not a comment on its products, ethics or quality. Hospitals, diagnostics and healthcare services are a separate case and sit in the Ahimsa band.

Section 04

How We Assign a Band

01

We read what the company says about itself

Its name, its business description and the stated objects of the issue — the company's own words in its own filings, not a third-party summary.

02

We match that against a published activity list

The business activities in each band are set out above and maintained in the open. Every label records which of them applied.

03

An editor reviews the result

Every Non-Ahimsa label is confirmed by a person before it ever appears on the site. Automation proposes; it does not publish.

04

Unclear cases get no label at all

If a company's description does not say enough to judge, we show nothing rather than guess.

Wherever a badge appears on the site, hovering over it shows the reason that band was assigned, and clicking it brings you back here.

Section 05

Attribution & Independence

The IPO Guru Ahimsa Framework is based on the AQ framework published by the Ahimsa Investment Movement, and we gratefully acknowledge that work as its foundation.

We maintain our own framework, however, and refine its categories as we learn — so a band shown here may differ from AIM's own view of the same company, and any error in a label here is ours, not theirs.

No affiliation

IPO Guru is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of the Ahimsa Investment Movement, the Ahimsagain Foundation, or NSE Indices Limited. "Nifty500 Ahimsa Index" is a mark of NSE Indices Limited; we do not reproduce that index or its constituent list, and inclusion in or exclusion from it is not implied by anything shown here.

Section 06

What This Is Not

These labels describe what a business does. IPO Guru is not a SEBI registered investment advisor or research analyst, and an Ahimsa band is none of the following.

A recommendation to apply, buy, hold or sell
A rating of financial merit or quality
A judgement on governance or management
An audit, certification or accreditation
A view on whether an issue is worth applying to
A statement that a company has broken any law

See our full disclaimer for how we handle all content on this site.

Think a label is wrong?

We would rather be corrected than be wrong. If you represent a company and believe its classification does not reflect its business — or if you are a reader who has spotted an error — tell us and we will review it.

Report a correction